<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>nuclear weapons on Policymaker.net</title>
    <link>https://policymaker.net/tags/nuclear-weapons/</link>
    <description>Recent content in nuclear weapons on Policymaker.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://policymaker.net/tags/nuclear-weapons/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Lawmakers Push Back on Plutonium Pit Production, Question Scope, Cost, and Strategy</title>
      <link>https://policymaker.net/lawmakers-push-back-on-plutonium-pit-production-question-scope-cost-and-strategy/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://policymaker.net/lawmakers-push-back-on-plutonium-pit-production-question-scope-cost-and-strategy/</guid>
      <description>A new letter from John Garamendi and Elizabeth Warren lands squarely in the middle of a long-running, uneasy debate over the future of the United States’ nuclear weapons infrastructure. Writing to Department of Energy Secretary Chris Wright, the two lawmakers are urging a serious reassessment of the plutonium pit production program, with a specific call to pause work at the Savannah River Site until clear guardrails are in place to prevent further waste of taxpayer money.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
