<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>autocracy on Policymaker.net</title>
    <link>https://policymaker.net/tags/autocracy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in autocracy on Policymaker.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://policymaker.net/tags/autocracy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Franchise Model of Neo-Autocracy</title>
      <link>https://policymaker.net/2026/04/12/the-franchise-model-of-neo-autocracy/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://policymaker.net/2026/04/12/the-franchise-model-of-neo-autocracy/</guid>
      <description>Why Orbán&amp;rsquo;s Fall Would Matter More Than Trump&amp;rsquo;s The franchise metaphor is more precise than it might first appear, and precision is where the insight lives.
A business franchise operates on a core proposition: the model has been proven to work, the brand conveys that proof, and new operators buy in not just to run a business but to inherit a playbook. The playbook is the product. In neo-autocracy, the playbook is: capture the judiciary first, then the media, then the electoral rules.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
